Hire React developers you can check before you commit
We place React developers inside your team, in your repository, working to your review process. Our React code has been public on GitHub under our own name since 2017.
Tell us the work and the date
A software engineer reads it, not a sales desk. A reply usually comes within 24 hours, and a shortlist within a few days.
Why hiring React developers keeps stalling
Nothing on a CV separates someone who has shipped React in production from someone who followed a tutorial well. That difference lives inside the code. A portfolio, a keyword screen and a one-hour interview all measure a different surface.
Sound familiar?
A senior frontend developer writing at frontendjoy catalogued 29 React codebase red flags. Every one is a code-review finding. Not one of them shows up on a CV.
- Everyone lists React, so a keyword screen returns a hundred names and separates none of them
- The strongest CV on the shortlist wrote components that re-render on every keystroke, and week three is when you found out
- You cannot read the code yourself, and the person who can is already on the thing that is late
- Endless recruiting cycles and missed windows, which is the first thing this engagement was built to stop
- Senior titles and junior output, which is the second
Most React hiring pages lead with a claim about themselves: the top three percent, the top two percent, an advanced recruitment process. None of it is checkable before you make contact. Three things are, and they are the ones almost nobody puts in writing: who owns the code and what you keep if we stop, when you actually get to talk to the people doing the work, and source code you can read before you call.
Whoever holds the veto here does not want adjectives. They want code. Both repositories below are ours and both are public. Send them to the person whose opinion decides this. If the verdict is no, you have saved yourself a call.
Read our React code first
Atyantik/react-pwa, our React starter
MIT-licensed TypeScript React, public under our own name since 24 June 2017, with 2,556 stars and 296 forks. Last pushed 29 July 2024, so judge it as code rather than as current work.
GitHub repository · TypeScript, MIT licence · about 40 minutesOpen it on GitHub — Atyantik/react-pwa, our React starter (opens in new tab)Atyantik/pawjs, a second public repository
Also public on GitHub under our own name, with 163 stars. Last pushed 13 February 2026, so read the commits and the structure and draw your own conclusion.
GitHub repository · about 25 minutesOpen it on GitHub — Atyantik/pawjs, a second public repository (opens in new tab)
Knowing React is not one skill any more. The parts that cost teams time never appear on a CV. The State of React 2025 survey asked developers what they struggle with most. It was run independently at survey.devographics.com, with 3,760 responses and a mean of 8.52 years of experience. Those are industry figures and not ours. The same survey puts 48.4% of daily React users on React 19 and 41% on React 18. If you cannot read the answers yourself, ask about these four anyway. Listen for whether the answer has a story in it.
Show data table
| Item | Share of respondents |
|---|---|
| useEffect | 37% |
| Dependency arrays | 21% |
| Ecosystem complexity | 11% |
| Server Components | 6% |
Ask about the first two and you learn more in ten minutes than a CV tells you in a week.
Whether we are the right fit
Where we fit
You need React software engineers inside your team, in your repository, working to your review process
You have a React codebase somebody else wrote, and you want people who will read it before proposing to replace it
The person who signs cannot assess React themselves, so whoever can needs to check the work continuously
You want to find out in weeks rather than quarters whether this was the wrong decision
Where we are not
Your stack is not React, and what you need is Vue, Svelte or plain JavaScript work.
You need the whole frontend covered rather than React specifically, across whatever the interface is built in.
The interface is React and already too slow, which is a repair job with a target rather than a hire.
You want the component library itself built, which is a project with an end date rather than a hire.
building the component library itself rather than staffing it
You need the API as well as the interface, with one person owning both ends of it.
Here is what happens between your first message and someone writing code in your repository. It includes the point where you can stop.
You tell us the work and the date
What you are building, what it runs on now, how many people you need and when they start. A software engineer reads it, not a sales desk.
A shortlist comes back within a few days
The pilot comes with it, written out: what it covers, how long it runs, and the criteria it will be judged against. Ours are agreed with you before it starts.
You interview, if you want to
Many clients run their full hiring loop; others trust our vetting and skip interviews entirely. Either path is fine, and the choice is yours.
The pilot runs for two to three weeks
Real work in your repository, reviewed by your own people. It is measured against criteria written down before anyone started, so nothing about the judgement is retrospective.
You stop here, or you keep going
If the pilot does not meet the agreed criteria, we replace the developer and re-run the pilot with the next candidate, against the same criteria.
Timezone is a go or no-go, so settle it here instead of on a call. We run on IST, 10:00 to 19:00 India time, and all our developers are currently based in India. The daily standup is held in your working hours, not ours. It runs about thirty minutes with the lead, and the team joins it when the work needs them. That is the answer to when you actually get to talk to someone, and it is worth asking for in hours rather than adjectives.
Atyantik, published working hours
Atyantik operational commitment, confirmed 31 August 2026
Counted from our own engagement record
Who owns the code
You want to end it and find the work is hostage.
Ownership and what you are handed on termination are rarely written down anywhere you can check before you sign.
What we commit to
From day one, every line of code is your IP. Code lives in your repositories and deployments in your cloud accounts. Ending the engagement is a permissions change on your side.
Nobody left who knows how it runs.
The expensive part of a departure is rarely the code. It is everything that never got written down.
What we commit to
Any documentation we produce is yours to keep. If you offboard us, you keep everything, including the operational runbook. Architecture decisions are documented in the technical requirements specification as they are made.
Vendor churn and handover gaps.
This is one of the pain points this engagement was built to remove, so it is answered with a term rather than a reassurance.
What we commit to
You meet the people who will do the work. If someone has to be replaced, the replacement runs the same pilot against the same written criteria.
The quality drops once nobody is watching.
IP and security worries sit on the same list of things this engagement was built to remove.
What we commit to
Senior review on every change, GitFlow, unit and integration tests, and CI gating every merge. Your people review in the same pipeline, so the bar stays visible to you throughout.
Three things move what this costs, and you already know all three. How many people, and for how long. Whether we are adding hands to a team that already has senior review, or supplying that review ourselves. And the state of the codebase we join, which is not a detail. The State of React 2025 survey, run independently at survey.devographics.com with 3,760 responses, puts 48.4% of daily React users on React 19 and 41% on React 18. Those are industry figures and not ours. React 18 with no tests and no design system is not the same job as React 19 with both. Most engagements run three months or longer, because that is when the productivity curve from a new developer flattens. Shorter ones work for clearly-scoped pilots, fix-it work or specialist projects. If a whole team fits better than one person, read about a whole team rather than one person instead.
What you are committing to
Pilot
2 to 3 weeks
What it includes
- Real work in your repository, against criteria written and agreed before it starts
- Your own review process on every change, not a demo at the end
- Everything produced stays yours either way
What moves the number the criteria you want to judge on span more than one part of the codebase
React software engineers
Three months or longer
Length follows the work, not the contract.
What it includes
- Named people you interviewed, in your repository and your standups
- Senior review, tests and CI gating every merge
- Architecture decisions documented in the technical requirements specification
- Any change to time, effort or cost written up as a change note before approval, entering the plan only on your written sign-off
What moves the number we are supplying the senior review as well as the hands, not joining a team that reviews at that level
Size it before you decide anything
A reply usually comes within 24 hours, and a shortlist within a few days. Not a quote, and not a price.
For whoever else has to agree
The person who signs this, or vetoes it, will not read the rest. They will read whatever you paste into a message.
Forward this part
Atyantik Technologies, on React software engineers joining the team
- The check anyone can run. Atyantik publish React code on GitHub under their own name. Atyantik/react-pwa is MIT-licensed TypeScript React, public since 24 June 2017, with 2,556 stars and 296 forks, last pushed on 29 July 2024. Atyantik/pawjs is a second public repository with 163 stars, last pushed on 13 February 2026. Both are readable without contacting anyone.
- The working hours. Atyantik run 10:00 to 19:00 IST, with all developers currently based in India. The daily standup is held in your working hours rather than theirs. It runs about thirty minutes with the lead, and the team joins when the work needs them.
- The way in. A pilot of two to three weeks, judged against evaluation criteria written and agreed before it starts.
- Ownership. From day 1, every line of code is your IP. Code lives in your repositories and deployments in your cloud accounts. If you offboard them, you keep everything, including the operational runbook.
- The ask. Half an hour to agree the pilot scope and the criteria it would be judged against.
Questions that come up before a first call
The things worth settling before anyone books half an hour.
Can we read your React code before we get in touch?
Who owns the React code your developers write for us?
How is React work reviewed before it reaches the main branch?
Can we interview the React developers you propose?
What hours will your React developers work?
What happens if the React developer we picked leaves?
How long does a React engagement usually run?
What happens when the scope changes part way through the build?
Tell us the work and the date
Say what you are building, what it runs on today, how many React software engineers you need, and when they have to start.
A reply usually comes within 24 hours. A shortlist follows, typically within a few days of your brief. With it comes a pilot scope, and its evaluation criteria are written and agreed before the pilot starts.
It is not a quote and not a price. A rate nobody has scoped yet is a number neither of us should act on.
- Usually a reply within 24 hours
- A software engineer reads it, not a sales desk
- Everything you share stays private