We build software for Seattle companies
Building cloud-native systems for Seattle means you have strong software engineers in-house who know exactly what they are looking for. We work alongside them from planning through launch.
- When we work
10:00 to 19:00 IST year roundThat is 04:30 to 13:30 UTC. Against a Seattle working day of 09:00 to 17:00 Pacific, there is almost no overlap. Work happens through written channels, with live sessions arranged on request.
- Where code lives
Your Git and your cloud accountsDeployments run in your AWS, GCP or Azure accounts. Code sits in your repositories. You own it from the first commit.
- Who builds it
50+ software engineers in IndiaAtyantik is based in Gujarat, India. No US office, no local presence. What we bring is architecture and execution, not timezone overlap.
Tell us what you are building.
You get a reply within one business day, with a technical person on the call.
Start with a paragraph
What it does, who uses it, and what has to be true before you can sign. One business day, technical person on the call.
Which engagement shape fits your project
Three ways to engage, depending on whether you are starting from scratch, scaling out a full vision, or filling a gap in your existing team.
| MVP | Full build | Team extension | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery and architecture | MVPFull discovery and architecture | Full buildComplete scope including secondary features | Team extensionYour existing architecture, our software engineers |
| What ships | MVPCore features scoped and shipped | Full buildSecurity and compliance audit | Team extensionIntegration with your process |
| Release | MVPDeployment to production | Full buildPerformance and optimization | Team extensionCode review and deployment by your standards |
| After launch | MVPPost-launch support option | Full buildAnnual maintenance contract available | Team extensionA term you agree, extended when you say so |
What the working window does and does not change
A fixed schedule means someone does not have to watch the calendar to know when the team is available. It also means decisions sometimes move at a pace different from what you are used to.
The trade-offs
Decisions are written before they are approved
What that means
That is how things move in an asynchronous window. Slack threads, email, and change notes become your decision log. That log is also your audit trail and your handoff document if someone else takes over the project later.
It does not remove the need for live conversation
What that means
It changes the cadence. A technical architecture decision might be threaded over two days instead of settled in an hour. The architecture is better for the thinking time. The schedule is worse for the waiting. Pick which one matters more for this project.
A coordinated overlap shift buys three to five hours
What that means
That is enough for a design review with your whole team in the room, an architecture discussion with your architects, or a retrospective after a launch. It is not continuous cover. Some projects need it; most do not.
What Seattle software engineering teams ask first
Seattle companies know cloud-native architecture. What they check is ownership, process, and who actually codes.
The three things that decide this
1
Do we own the code?
The code, the cloud accounts and the IP are yours from Day 1, and that is the first thing to confirm.
- Why 2 waits for 1Ownership is settled before work starts.
2
How does code review actually work?
Every line reviewed by a senior software engineer before it merges. GitFlow, unit tests, integration tests, CI/CD gates. The standard your own team would demand.
- Why 3 waits for 2Process is deterministic and is visible from the first merge.
3
Who do we talk to?
Not a project manager with a software engineer copied in. A technical person who understands architecture, can make decisions, and carries the knowing into the next meeting.
What each stage produces
01
Planning
Discovery into a scope and timeline that both sides can commit to.
You get
A scope document, timeline, and architecture sketch for the first conversation.
02
Architecture
Design the system, the decisions that matter, and the path to launch.
You get
Technical requirements specification, architecture diagrams, and deployment plan.
03
Development
Build and test, with every change reviewed and every merge gated.
You get
Source code in your repositories, CI/CD pipelines, tests, and runbooks.
04
Launch
Move to production, validate, and transition to support.
You get
Deployment procedures, access handoff, and post-launch runbook.
Here is the version to paste
At some point you have to explain this to someone who was not in these meetings and will never read a supplier's website.
Forward this part
Atyantik Technologies, software delivery supplier summary
- Supplier. Atyantik Technologies. 50+ software engineers, designers, and specialists based in Gujarat, India. No US office or entity.
- Hours. Monday to Friday, 10:00 to 19:00 IST, which is 04:30 to 13:30 UTC, all year. India does not change its clocks, so that window never shifts with daylight saving. North American teams sit outside it for most of their day. Work gets scheduled around that rather than pretending otherwise.
- Code ownership. Code lives in your repositories and deployments in your cloud accounts. You own it from the first commit. Every line reviewed by a senior software engineer before it merges.
- Process. GitFlow, unit tests, integration tests, CI/CD gates. The standard your own team would demand. Scope is agreed in writing before work starts and a change is written down before it is accepted.
- Engagement shapes. Full build from planning to launch. Team extension into your existing architecture. Or MVP for the core features and a decision point after launch.
- Post-launch. 50+ enterprise engagements across 7 countries, all of them run from India. Some step back after launch. Most continue as an Annual Maintenance Contract or a lean-mode arrangement where we stay available but you call the shots.
Or put us in front of them instead
Send the paragraph and we bring these answers to the first call, within one business day.
The timezone reality
Whether to call us
Where we fit
You are building or rebuilding a product and want one team on it rather than rotating through vendors. You get a core team assigned only to your project, and a lead software engineer you talk to directly.
Your team is strong in-house and you need to extend it without rotating people. We integrate into your existing architecture and your process.
You are in Seattle or a similar timezone and you are comfortable with written decisions and scheduled live sessions instead of continuous overlap.
Where we are the wrong call
You need somebody reachable across a full Seattle working day. Our window is 04:30 to 13:30 UTC. An overlap shift extends it on request; it does not cover the day.
Your process requires real-time collaboration across a working day. Asynchronous communication is how this works, and some projects need synchronous for every decision.
You want to see delivered work before you talk to anyone. There is a better starting point than a contact form.
Questions your own process will generate
Do you have an office in Seattle?
What is the actual working overlap with Seattle?
How do you handle the timezone difference?
Who owns the code?
What do we get at each stage?
Tell us what you are building
A paragraph is enough. What it does, who uses it, and what has to be true before you can sign.
If the timezone overlap is what is blocking you, say so in the message. We bring those answers to the first call instead of the third.
- You get a reply within one business day with a technical person on the call, not a salesperson with a software engineer copied in.
- The first conversation returns a scope, and the number follows the scope.