DevOps and CI/CD services

Check the DevOps terms before you sign

What stalls this decision is what you are left holding afterwards, not the price. Here are the numbers, the terms, and what you own from day one.

Tell us what you are running

Send us the shape of your setup and what keeps breaking. A named person reads it and replies.

How we handle what you send is set out in our privacy notice.

What DevOps work actually costs to run

$0.006A minute of pipeline time

GitHub Actions, standard hosted 2-core Linux runner past the included allowance, read 2026-08-29.

$103,680A person who can run it

US annual mean for Network and Computer Systems Administrators, BLS OEWS 2025, SOC 15-1244, median $99,130.

The compute is not where the money goes. BLS publishes no DevOps occupation, so Software Developers, SOC 15-1252, at a $148,100 mean is the upper bound on the same work. Neither figure is a comparison with the other, and neither tells you where we sit.

Who answers when it breaks, and how fast

What four published support policies say, and what ours says
ProviderWhat the published policy commits to
GoogleThe Technical Support Services Guidelines, clause 3.5, Request Acknowledgement. Google may respond to a Request by acknowledging receipt of the Request. Customer acknowledges and understands that Google may be unable to provide answers to, or resolve all Requests.
MicrosoftInitial Response Time is the period from when you submit your support request to when a Microsoft Support Engineer contacts you and starts working on your support request. The clock stops at engagement, not at resolution.
CloudflareSupport response times are published for Enterprise at P1 two hours and P2 four hours. Premium Enterprise is P1 one hour and P2 two hours. No support response time is published for Business. For pay-as-you-go and Free the page states that no SLAs are offered. Read 2026-08-30.
HerokuNo numeric response-time commitment at any tier on the support channels page. Heroku states that Standard tickets get a reply within a few business days. Premium offers 24x7 direct access with no response figure attached. Read 2026-08-30.
AtyantikBusiness hours are Monday to Friday, 10:00 to 19:00 IST. Inside those hours the response targets are P1 four working hours, P2 twenty-four working hours, and seventy-two working hours for everything else. Like Microsoft above, that clock measures acknowledgement by a named person, not resolution. No out-of-hours paging. After launch the arrangement is an Annual Maintenance Contract or a lean mode, both through the same documented change-note process.

Why most teams stay where they are

Show data table
This is the share of surveyed professionals sitting at the mid-level of DevOps evolution. It was 79% in 2018, 79% in 2019 and 79% in 2020. The 2020 sample was more than 2,400. Read what this measures, because it is easy to misread. It is where teams sit on a maturity model. It is not a failure rate, not an abandonment rate, and not a cancellation rate. A team at the mid-level can be shipping every week and running a business perfectly well. The 2020 report calls that group 'Still stuck in the middle'. The finding worth carrying out of this chart is not any of the individual years. It is that the line is flat. Three years of surveys, thousands of professionals, and the middle stayed exactly the same size. Most teams end up there and most teams stay there. That is the normal outcome of doing this in-house alongside everything else, not evidence that anyone did it badly.
Stage Share of surveyed professionals
2018 79%
2019 79%
2020 79%
Figure This is the share of surveyed professionals sitting at the mid-level of DevOps evolution. It was 79% in 2018, 79% in 2019 and 79% in 2020. The 2020 sample was more than 2,400. Read what this measures, because it is easy to misread. It is where teams sit on a maturity model. It is not a failure rate, not an abandonment rate, and not a cancellation rate. A team at the mid-level can be shipping every week and running a business perfectly well. The 2020 report calls that group 'Still stuck in the middle'. The finding worth carrying out of this chart is not any of the individual years. It is that the line is flat. Three years of surveys, thousands of professionals, and the middle stayed exactly the same size. Most teams end up there and most teams stay there. That is the normal outcome of doing this in-house alongside everything else, not evidence that anyone did it badly. State of DevOps Report, 2018-2020 series, n over 2,400 in 2020

What we looked for, and what we could not find

Before writing any of this we went looking for numbers. We wanted the ones that would let you buy this on evidence rather than on trust. How often does this work get abandoned? What actually separates the teams that get it right? And what do the numbers say a good outcome looks like? Here is what came back, including the parts that came back empty. A provider who only shows you the searches that worked is showing you a sales deck.

How often this work is abandonedWe could not find a published figure. We searched analyst directories, vendor research libraries, the State of DevOps series, government statistics, academic indexes and general web search. That is six routes in all, and we came back with nothing usable. We could not find a published figure. That is a different statement from saying no data exists, and we are making the first one.
The one dataset that would answer itThe Standish Group CHAOS report. It sits behind a USD 450 paywall and we have not read it. We quote nothing from it, paraphrase nothing from it, and estimate nothing using it. If a competitor quotes a CHAOS number at you, it is fair to ask where they got it. Did they buy the report, or copy the number from somebody who summarised it?
The scoreboard everyone quotesDORA last published its elite, high, medium and low threshold table in the 2024 report, with n of approximately 3,000. The tiers were Elite 19%, High 22%, Medium 35%, Low 25%. Those shares sum to 101 because DORA publishes them rounded. We have left them as published rather than shaving a point to make the arithmetic look tidy. The current report is State of AI-assisted Software Development 2025, with n of 4,867. It replaced the four tiers with seven profiles and publishes no threshold table at all. So no provider can certify a team against that scale today, whatever they tell you.
What the category sells insteadForecasts, in place of measurements. We reviewed four Gartner predictions for this space and used none of them. The sharpest was that by 2027, 80% of large organizations will embrace platform engineering to successfully scale DevOps. That may well turn out to be right. It is still a statement about 2027 made in advance, and you cannot check it against anything today. That is exactly why we do not use it as evidence.

What we build, and what you hold

  1. 01

    Documentation

    Documentation starts at the beginning of the project, not at the end of it. It covers the deployment and the CI/CD pipelines as they are built.

    You get

    Written deployment and pipeline documentation you hold from the first weeks, rather than a handover pack assembled on the way out.

  2. 02

    Code and review

    GitFlow branching, unit and integration tests, CI/CD gating every merge, and a senior software engineer reviewing the code before it lands.

    You get

    A merge history where every change passed the same gates, plus Technical Requirements Specification records of the architecture decisions and why each was taken.

  3. 03

    Deployment

    We deploy across AWS, Google Cloud, DigitalOcean, Cloudflare, Vercel and Netlify, so the target is your choice rather than ours.

    You get

    Working pipelines on the cloud accounts you chose, with the deployment steps written down next to them in plain language.

  4. 04

    Running it

    We build pipelines that target 98-99% uptime under normal operating conditions, and cloud-provider outages sit outside our scope. Everything within that scope is our responsibility.

    You get

    The uptime target, the scope boundary and what sits inside it, all three stated together in the engagement terms you sign.

  5. 05

    The team

    DevOps and QA are part of the delivery model. For full-team buildouts, developers are paired with at least one DevOps and one QA engineer.

    You get

    Named people on your engagement, with the DevOps and QA pairing written into the scope of a full-team buildout.

What happens if you leave

  • You cannot get your system back

    Documentation is written from day one and the handoff is a process, not a hostage situation. You have that freedom from day one.

    What we commit to

    You can end the engagement at any point and leave with the documented system, the pipelines and the accounts. So far, no client has needed to use that exit, and we would rather say that plainly than let you assume it has been road-tested.

  • Nobody wrote anything down

    NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5 control SA-5 asks for system documentation, and CM-2 for a baseline configuration. SP 800-218 SSDF PS.3 asks the same of software.

    What we commit to

    The SA-5 discussion names lack of support from developers and contractors as a reason documentation goes missing, and puts the cost of recreating it on the organisation that inherits the system. We do not certify against these frameworks; we write the documentation.

  • You will not be here in three years

    Our longest active partnership has run more than a decade, and we have delivered 50+ enterprise engagements across 7 countries.

    What we commit to

    The proof that matters is not a logo wall. It is that the longest relationship has run more than a decade, and that when an engagement ends, what runs is yours, in your accounts, documented well enough for the next team to pick up.

Who this is not for

Before you spend another meeting on this, one thing is worth settling first. Do you need a contractual response time at two in the morning, or the system documented and yours?

  • Buy a managed provider

    Choose this when

    If you need someone paged out of hours, buy a managed provider that publishes 24/7 response, because we publish targets for business hours, Monday to Friday, only.

    It costs you

    Cloudflare publishes two hours for a P1 at Enterprise and one hour at Premium Enterprise. That is a real instrument, and we cannot match it by saying we will try.

  • Work with us

    Choose this when

    If what you need is the pipelines built, documented and running in your own accounts, with the terms written down first.

    It costs you

    The scope is agreed and written down before anything starts, and a change to it goes through a documented change note. The DevOps and QA pairing applies to full-team buildouts, not to one person dropped in.

DevOps questions we get asked

The seven that come up in nearly every first call, answered straight.

How much does it cost to set up CI, CD and infrastructure?
Not from a web page. What the number depends on is the shape of the work, and the first conversation settles that. What you can hold us to is how it gets arrived at.
  • The scope is agreed and written down before anything starts.
  • A change to that scope goes through a documented change note, so nothing moves in the build on a re-scope you have not accepted.
  • What each stage produces is named up front, so you can tell whether it landed.
  • Ask whoever else is bidding for the same three things in writing, and compare those rather than the first number either of us says.
Do you offer 24/7 support with a guaranteed response time?
Not 24/7. Atyantik works Monday to Friday, 10:00 to 19:00 IST, and publishes response targets inside those hours: four working hours for P1, twenty-four for P2, seventy-two for everything else.
  • Seventy-two working hours is eight working days, so say two working weeks if that is what you need to plan around.
  • Those targets measure acknowledgement by a named person, not resolution, which is the same thing the Microsoft Initial Response Time measures.
  • There is no out-of-hours paging.
  • After launch you are on an Annual Maintenance Contract or a lean-mode arrangement, both through the same documented change-note process that governs delivery against agreed scope.
  • It is worth knowing what the large providers commit to before you judge that. Google Technical Support Services Guidelines, clause 3.5, states that Google may respond to a request by acknowledging receipt. It also states that the customer acknowledges Google may be unable to provide answers to, or resolve all requests.
  • Cloudflare publishes a two-hour P1 support response for Enterprise and publishes no support response time for Business.
  • Heroku publishes no numeric response-time commitment at any tier.
  • If you need a paged contractual response time, buy it from a provider that publishes one.
What happens to our pipelines when the engagement ends?
You keep them, running, with the documentation.
  • We write documentation from the start of the project, covering the deployment and the CI/CD pipelines.
  • The handoff is a process rather than a hostage situation. You have that freedom from day one rather than at the end of a notice period.
  • So far, no client has needed to use that exit path.
  • It matters anyway, because of what happens when documentation is missing: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 control SA-5 names lack of support from developers and contractors as a cause of absent system documentation. It puts the cost of recreating it on the organisation that inherits the system. That bill lands on you, not on the provider who left.
What uptime do you commit to?
We build pipelines that target 98-99% uptime under normal operating conditions. Cloud-provider outages sit outside our scope. Everything within it is our responsibility. Each of those three sentences changes the other two. Target is not a guarantee and we will not write it as one. The scope boundary is there because an AWS or Cloudflare region going down is not something we can control. A provider who tells you otherwise is selling you a number they cannot honour. And the third sentence is what stops the second from becoming an excuse. Inside our scope, it is ours, and we do not get to point at a cloud status page.
What outcome can you actually promise?
Not a benchmark position, and treat carefully anyone who promises you one. DORA last published its elite, high, medium and low threshold table in the 2024 report, with n of approximately 3,000. The current report is State of AI-assisted Software Development 2025, with n of 4,867. It replaced those four tiers with seven profiles and publishes no threshold table. So no provider can certify a team against that scale today. We also went looking for a published rate for how often this kind of work gets abandoned. We searched six routes and could not find one. The dataset most people reach for is the Standish Group CHAOS report. It sits behind a USD 450 paywall and we have not read it. We are not quoting anything from it. We could not find a figure. That is different from saying none exists.
Do we have to give you production access?
The accounts stay yours.
  • If you already have Git hosting, cloud accounts and storage, we work inside them. If you do not have them, we provision them, set them up, and hand the keys over to you.
  • Code lives in your repositories and deployments live in your cloud accounts.
  • If you offboard us, you keep everything, including the operational runbook.
  • Who gets which level of access, and to what, is set per engagement during scoping. It is written down before anyone touches anything.
  • One thing we will not do is claim more than we have: Atyantik does not certify against compliance frameworks.
How quickly can you get something running in production?
On our MVP work, the average from intake to first production deploy is around 3.5 weeks. That unit matters and we state it deliberately: first production deploy, not launch, and not a finished product. Those three get quoted as if they were one duration, and they are not. That is how a three and a half week figure turns into an argument four months later. For a DevOps engagement on a system you already run, the honest answer depends on your current deployment. We will tell you after we have seen it, rather than before.

Ask us yours

Tell us what you are running

Send the shape of your setup and what is going wrong with it. You get a straight answer about whether we are the right people for it. It comes from a named person who has read what you wrote. This starts a conversation. It does not produce a quote, because nobody can price a system they have not looked at. Any number we gave you now would be one we would have to take back.

Tirth Bodawala, Chief Technology Officer of Atyantik Technologies
Tirth BodawalaChief Technology Officer, Atyantik Technologies
  • No sales sequence
  • A named person replies
  • This form does not produce a quote

Get in touch

We usually reply within 24 hours.

How we handle what you send is set out in our privacy notice.